On Saturday, March 1, 2014 6:59:30 PM UTC-5, David Joyner wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Jorge Garcia <calc...@aol.com<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > Hello everyone, 
> > 
> > I ran into the following 2 issues regarding a power regression. Can 
> someone 
> > shed some light on this? 
> > 
> > (1) 
> > I'm trying to solve(f(x)==100,x) at the end of this worksheet. Why 
> doesn't 
> > the last cell work, but the next to last cell works fine? 
> > https://sage.math.clemson.edu:34567/home/pub/606/ 
> > 
> > (2) 
>


I'm pretty sure it's because there are zillions of significant digits and 
Maxima doesn't like that.  It wants to interpret this as a symbolic thing 
to the crazy 1994xytz/100000000 or whatever power, and that is something it 
takes time with.  Try solving

solve(x^1.9==100,x) 

and note that even this takes a bit, and 1.99 takes longer.  And 

sage: len(solve(x^1.99==100,x))
199

Which makes sense - 199 199th roots of unity, in essence!  Now do you see 
why it takes so long?  :-)  But numerical solvers should do just fine, 
since only one or two will be real in any given case.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-edu" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-edu+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-edu@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to