Mon 2019-09-02 10:57:11 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > I am trying to understand the rationale behind this change in naming. > In particular as most (all?) distributions, apart from Conda, that > ship lcalc, use > include/Lfunction rather than include/libLfunction. > > In particular this makes unvendoring lcalc unnecessary complicated, as > both > naming schemes have to be supported. > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28224 > Can we go back to include/Lfunction (Conda can fix this, as Isuru says)? >
Note: after I posted on sage-packaging to point to the discussion here, some discussion is happening there: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-packaging/xvh55IxHTZg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/8ef32645-a0be-493d-81cc-717fd2d00d16%40googlegroups.com.
