I am trying to understand the rationale behind this change in naming. In particular as most (all?) distributions, apart from Conda, that ship lcalc, use include/Lfunction rather than include/libLfunction.
In particular this makes unvendoring lcalc unnecessary complicated, as both naming schemes have to be supported. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28224 Can we go back to include/Lfunction (Conda can fix this, as Isuru says)? Thanks Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq2po%3DXzujnvO8rPGcxKWLiu%3DZQb3PHe8XZfwfWdKdZF%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
