Am Dienstag, 25. Dezember 2018 16:32:10 UTC+1 schrieb Andrey Novoseltsev: > > On Tuesday, 25 December 2018 03:55:13 UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote: >> >> Since there is only one process, there should be a single instance of >> the R object in Sage. Isn't that a trivial fix? >> >> Disallowing multiple R instances might be a misfeature. But it is not >> dramatic (to my mind and to the OP). >> >> Vincent >> > > It does not affect me personally at all, my use of R is limited to making > it work in SageMathCell. But if there is only one instance, then I think > R() should always return that single instance rather than a new wrapper > each time and perhaps it should be deprecated and removed from the global > namespace so that interaction goes through the precreated r object only. >
Not sure how deprecation in sage works. Wouldn't that needlessly break some scripts? > It seems to me that the main use for R() vs. r before would be to create a > new instance which does not work anymore. (Although I used it to pickup a > new working directory and alter graphic initialization commands.) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
