Le 25/12/2018 à 11:01, Timo Kaufmann a écrit :
Am Dienstag, 25. Dezember 2018 00:25:40 UTC+1 schrieb William:
Just to be clear, I fully support your choice.
Glad to hear that :)
By "both should be
supported, since they have complementary functionality (pros and cons
to each)... Oh well." I mean "I personally think both should be
supported. However, since I do not have the time or resources right
now to do so, then whoever does have those resources (you) should
decide." Thank you for taking the time to explain your choices
above, and more about the issues.
-- William
--
William (http://wstein.org)
I hope I didn't sound too defensive -- It was certainly not my intention to
break anybodies workflow. I tried my best to match the behaviour of the old
interface as closely as possible (and added some new tests for that).
Unfortunately I missed that part. Sorry for that.
I think the fix would be non-trivial though and I'm not sure if it is worth
pursuing.
Since there is only one process, there should be a single instance of
the R object in Sage. Isn't that a trivial fix?
Disallowing multiple R instances might be a misfeature. But it is not
dramatic (to my mind and to the OP).
Vincent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
