Travis : "I'm sorry, but that really sounds like "I want to get really good without practicing".
My hobby time credit is quite limited and there is a hugge difference between "without practicing" and good dev time management inducing *awareness* about the main Tools (or how to make good code being lazy, or taking account NIH). ... "without practicing" is a RTFM answer. Travis : "From my experience, the biggest issue that prevents people from fixing bugs in Sage is getting used to our development workflow and learning how to work with git (and more generally, version control software). " My main concern or the main reason why I am not prone for fixing bugs is the workflow too...but not because of learning new Tools. Apart from fixing "small bugs", modifications could be rejected by a "peer review" ... so why wasting time ? If peers are only the judges for a final result and not the helpers, why give time with no reward. For example : why correcting bugs in a graph package .... if all the graphs code will be soon removed from the sagemath modules, because of a "wonderful" new peer idea ? Dominique. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
