On 2018-06-03, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote: > Hi Travis, > > On 2018-06-03, Travis Scrimshaw <tsc...@ucdavis.edu> wrote: >> I am also generally in favor of having == being a (generally) fast check. >> However, the symbolics code takes the opposite approach: it has the method >> is_trivial_equal() for quick checks but == fires up the proof engine. > > No, that's not correct. > > For symbolics, "==" only does trivial checks
That's not correct either. "==" apparently always returns an equation, not a bool. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
