Dear Jeroen
Le lundi 23 octobre 2017 11:24:18 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
>
> On 2017-10-19 17:21, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> > I do not think that a
> > non-communicating R is useful in Sage.
>
> A non-communicating R in Sage can be very useful if you are not using R
> in Sage at all (which is very likely the vast majority of Sage users).
>
????? You are saying that X is useful if you don't use X at all ?
Either :
- I totally miss your point : I can't see how something can be useful if
you don't use it at all. Or :
- either :
- you are a Zen master using padoxes to enlighten your student (and
you failed to do so) ;
- you are a dandy enjoying paradoxes for the hell of it ;
- you are preparing for a career in management or politics.
Would you care to explain to a dentist of very little mind ?
as for "which is very likely the vast majority of Sage users" : I do not
know. I agree that I seem to be the only such voice on the sage-xxx lists.
Which might be a strong argument for splitting R off Sage
as already discussed on sage devel, and still discussed in this thread
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/B5gV0_MBiAc>. But the
last time this was discussed, the agreement seemed to be that R had to stay
in Sage.
And that does *not* solve "our" pip's lack of functionality, nor the
(interesting) security problem raised by Thierry.
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
