> On 15/09/2016, at 00:00, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > > On 2016-09-14 13:34, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> One still would have to do something to provide fortran, though. > > Exactly, so it's pointless to build Sage with clang since you won't be able > to compile any Fortran code. And I think that mixing compiler suites (clang + > gfortran) does not really work either.
The last thing on mixing compiler suite is to be proven. But then I have mixed C/C++ and Fortran from different vendors before (mainly GNU and IBM). In the last days where sage-on-gentoo-on-OSX was viable, I had inbox (at least) compiled with clang using a gfortran compiled blas and possibly lapack (netlib). Most of the rest was gcc compiled. François -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
