On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > On 2016-05-19 15:01, kcrisman wrote: >> >> Some of the latter maybe should be recategorized under sage-wishlist, >> which I think is a milestone. > > > I'm not sure if it's useful to keep "wishlist" tickets open if nobody > intends to work on them. There are quite some old tickets of the form "I > plan to implement feature X in Sage". If the person who posted that ticket > does not actually implement feature X and nobody else has shown interest in > the ticket, I think it's safe to just close the ticket.
I generally like to keep those kinds of tickets only unless there is some reason it has been explicitly ruled out.. YMMV. But there are also a ton of tickets that can and should be closed. It would be nice if we could triage those without the whole thing relying on one person. I don't think I've ever worked on another project where only one person can close tickets (at most there's someone whose job it is to occasionally review closed tickets). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
