On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 19:48:54 UTC+2, bluescarni wrote: > > PARI requires (required?) sizeof(mp_limb_t)==sizeof(void*), which is not > guaranteed and not enforceable by PARI (as it's up to GMP to decide what > exactly an mp_limb_t is). >
I think I understand now. I was misled by the person claiming Pari required sizeof(long) == sizeof(void*) and Bill Allombert debunking it. Bill was of course correct (he is a Pari dev). As for assuming sizeof(mp_limb_t) == sizeof(void*) we probably have the same issue in Flint. We will very slowly address this and have been making patches here and there. It's not a priority. However, that issue is entirely irrelevant to MSYS2. By default on that system both sizeof(mp_limb_t) and sizeof(void*) are 8 on Windows 64. The x32 issue is only affecting people who are wanting to support this trendy new ABI. Bill. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
