> This keeps with our convention of Groups vs AdditiveGroups and other similar > supercategories.
Err.. Doesn'it sound like very bad convention, if it leads us toward having a .cayley_graph() and .additive_cayley_graph() method in every ring?... > You could either separate out any parsing code or the entire function with > an added option for the operation into a helper function that gets called > from (additive_)cayley_graph(). I think the function is long enough to > warrant not duplicating everything. Okay okay, the usual style then. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
