Hey Nathann, There are a couple of things that I currently see: - This is considered to be a ring, not an additive group (which has no such function to create a Cayley graph), so you are specifying the multiplicative generators. - Without parameters, I get an attribute error for creating the Cayley graph of such as there are is monoid/semigroup_generators (which is good IMO wrt the previous note).
So I would create a similar function for the category of AdditiveSemigroups called additive_cayley_graph() to avoid any ambiguity and keeps with our convention that (semi)groups without "additive" are treated as multiplicative. Best, Travis On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 8:32:58 AM UTC-5, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > Playing with products of groups today, I was not able to obtain what I > expected from the 'cayley graph' function, as it seems to use (by > default) the multiplicative operation defined on my group (my group is > groups.misc.AdditiveCyclic(10)) > > What do you think is the cayley graph generated by '1' in the additive > group Z/10Z? > - A cycle? > - 10 non-adjacent vertices with a loop attached to each? > > The second wins. Check it out: > > sage: > groups.misc.AdditiveCyclic(10).cayley_graph(generators=[1]).show() > > If anybody knows how that could be fixed "cleanly"... > > Thaaaanks, > > Nathann > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
