2015-09-22 08:43:13 UTC+2, Ralf Stephan:
>
> On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 7:15:56 AM UTC+2, François wrote:
>>
>> OK but I don’t think you should hold back personally. 
>>
> It's just a matter of minimizing problems. There is no pressing need
> for override in Pynac.
>
> As to the link I gave, the new cryptominisat not only needs C++11
> but also, according to http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15674
>
>    - cmake and not autotools, but Sage does not include cmake
>    - more of Boost than Sage includes.
>    
> For more Boost, see ticket 17966

    http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17966
 

> So if Nathann was motivated by that he will have more on the plate.
> I'm second-guessing because you refused to be specific 8P
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to