Le 21/09/2015 14:16, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > On 2015-09-21 13:47, Nathann Cohen wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> What can we assume on our C compiler? Is it always gcc? > > First of all, compiler choices can always be overridden using SAGE_PORT > or SAGE_INSTALL_GCC. But let's assume that those variables are undefined. > > In that case, you can assume that the compiler is GCC-compatible, so it > could be GCC or it could be Clang or possibly a different compiler (ICC > maybe?). The version is at least version 4.4 (but not 4.6) >
Did anybody tried ICC ? I can do it, for fun... t.d. > That being said, if there is some future which really requires a more > recent compiler (say, for C++11 support), I wouldn't mind updating the > prerequisites. > > Note that this talks only about the compiler, which is just one piece of > the toolchain. Many compatibility problems are in fact due to the > linker, where less assumptions can be made. > > > Jeroen. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<<attachment: tdumont.vcf>>
