On Wednesday, June 10, 2015, François Bissey < francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> On 06/11/15 14:39, William Stein wrote: > >> I could easily imagine Andrew and Francois and Jereon are all >> dutifully imagining that I know all kinds of Polybori enthusiasts and >> there are good reasons that Polybori really must be really well >> supported in Sage. However, it turns out this at least isn't clear to >> me. >> > I wouldn't make that assumption. One of potential problem is that > polybori has small tentacles in other part of sage (crypto) besides > rings/polynomials and surgery to remove it or make it optional won't be > painless. Good question. That functionality would just become optional though the Cython build dependency issue could make it hard. > We may be relying on polybori much more than it appears on the surface. > > Francois > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Sent from my massive iPhone 6 plus. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
