Hi Viviane, On 2014-11-28, Viviane Pons <vivianep...@gmail.com> wrote: > As a "yes" voter, I would be totally in favor of changing the name to > "guidelines".
So, technically, your "yes" vote should in fact be counted as "no", because the vote was about a specific version of the text? > I'm also in favor of voting a new text that carries more people on. I think > we're in a bad situation now, with a vote that not everybody recognizes and > divides the community. I am in favor of some kind of "code of conduct" but > dividing the community is counter productive. +1. But this time please *after* an open discussion on the text. I do recognise that the majority of voters wants some kind of guidelines, but I do not recognise that the majority of voters wants this text, and also I do not recognise that the voting met democratic standards. A technical question: How can a discussion on text be organised? A wiki is of course one option for collaborative edition of a text, but I don't see how arguments can be exchanged by wiki. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
