On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 7:29:52 AM UTC-8, Jakob Kroeker wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014 14:47:29 UTC+1 schrieb Viviane Pons: > > > I would be in favour of this: having "guidelines" and not an enforced code. >> > > ++ > > ...that would require another voting which invalidates the previous one... > > It wouldn't invalidate it, it would be a vote for an amendment. This follows the legislative process.
Also, we're never going to get *everyone* to agree, that's why we take either a majority or super-majority (67%) opinion. However we haven't decided as a community what deserves a majority or super-majority vote. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
