On 2014-11-22, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) 
<drkir...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk> wrote:
> --089e0112ca127c6d2105087a3eb8
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On 21 Nov 2014 22:22, "Dima Pasechnik" <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd say it's OK to have such a code, but it's not really OK to actively
> enforce
>> it. Such an active enforcement would only be counterproductive, if not
>> outright impossible.
>>
>> Dima
>
> Is there any point in having something that is not enforced? That would
> just seem a waste of time to me.
>
> I note that you used the word "active" a couple of times. Do you think a
> code of conduct would lead to any benefits due to "passive" means, and if
> so how?

I meant that only really gross violations will be dealt with.

Many people want a code; enforcing is another story. Perhaps
the Dutch way would be the best...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gedogen

Dima
>
> Dave.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to