2014-11-21 23:48 GMT+01:00 Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de>: > > > In some post in this thread it was claimed that another post was sexist, > even though there was enough reason to refuse the claim. One person imputed > bad intention to another person, without considering "in dubio pro". Such > questionable, annoying and distracting claims and imputations will occur a > lot more when they can be based on the authority of a code of conduct. I > don't want it. That's how my comment is related with the current discussion. >
But if someone has doubt on a sentence being sexist or not, isn't it better if this doubt is removed? I think we all agreed now that this was only a language issue. I knew that already but if Mike had doubts, better for Nathann that this is now clear! > > Cheers, > Simon > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
