2014-11-14 10:05 GMT+01:00 rjf <fate...@gmail.com>: > My point here is that an unenlightened and obscure part of a problem > with one computer program has (I think mistakenly) been elevated to > a discussion of mathematics, open source, computer program reliability, > etc. It was probably not reviewed by any computer scientist with > expertise in computer > algebra systems. Should AMS publish a followup? Should it try to > find appropriate reviewers this time? >
I may precisely be because the article was not reviewed by someone with expertise in computer science and thus because it was a very naive article (at least I feel so, when the authors conclude that mathematicians should use two distinct software to check their results!), that it would be a nice thing to have a follow-up explaining precisely that the approach proposed in the previous article was too naive and that there are solutions to behave in a scientifically acceptable manner. Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
