On 12 November 2014 20:18, Ursula Whitcher <whitc...@uwec.edu> wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 3:41 AM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
>
>> If I am honest,  I am not that convinced it is a good follow up comment,
>
>
> OK, I won't put your name on it ;)

You can if I ultimately feel the submitted version is good !

> Thanks for the comments!
>
>> 1) Add a time line. How long it took from the reporting of the bug,  to
>> the bug fixed, peer reviewed, then to release of a new
>> alpha/beta/release candidate and finally to the release of a stable
>> version with the bug fixed.
>>
>> I suspect it was faster than the year or so the bug has remained in
>> Mathematica.
>
>
> All I can see from trac is that everything happened 22 months ago.  How do I
> find how long it took to go from positive review to stable release?

I need to go to a hospital soon, so are not going to give full
details, but a search of sage-release would show the dates when the
release manager made a particular release. I think times (in days) are
far more useful than actual dates, but you can work out the days from
the dates.

Dave

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to