On 12 November 2014 20:18, Ursula Whitcher <whitc...@uwec.edu> wrote: > On 11/11/2014 3:41 AM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > >> If I am honest, I am not that convinced it is a good follow up comment, > > > OK, I won't put your name on it ;)
You can if I ultimately feel the submitted version is good ! > Thanks for the comments! > >> 1) Add a time line. How long it took from the reporting of the bug, to >> the bug fixed, peer reviewed, then to release of a new >> alpha/beta/release candidate and finally to the release of a stable >> version with the bug fixed. >> >> I suspect it was faster than the year or so the bug has remained in >> Mathematica. > > > All I can see from trac is that everything happened 22 months ago. How do I > find how long it took to go from positive review to stable release? I need to go to a hospital soon, so are not going to give full details, but a search of sage-release would show the dates when the release manager made a particular release. I think times (in days) are far more useful than actual dates, but you can work out the days from the dates. Dave -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.