Hello ! > True, but is it good for user perspective to have two ways to same end?
When there is no risk of confusion I do not think that it is bad. Here the only risk of confusion is the following: P.join( ( (1,2), (3,4) ) ) In a poset that contains elements named (1,2), (3,4), as well as ((1,2),(3,4)). Not that there is no problem if the user types P.join( [ (1,2), (3,4) ] ) instead. It really is not a problem either to only have this P.join(a_list) available.... Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
