On 05/10/2014 08:00 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
I was motivated by this thread to look into pip again. I like it, so +1 for
inclusion.
We might e.g. drop SQLAlchemy in return,which would Sage smaller instead of
bigger. It is trivial to install using pip, it seems no code in the library
depends on it, and the version we are shipping is very old.
Cheers,
Martin
One scenario that can benefit from pip is a system with a global Sage
installation, and a user wants to install some Python package locally.
That user should be able to use "pip install --user PACKAGE", or similar.
Extra point: Starting with Python 3.4, there is a bundled installer for
pip [1,2] within Python. It became "the" Python package manager, or at
least the recommended one.
Regards,
TB
[1] https://www.python.org/download/releases/3.4.0
[2] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0453
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
