Yooooooooooo !!! > +1 also for "rings." and "fields.", even if we keep ZZ, QQ, AA,... in the > global namespace as well, since they correspond to very standard objects. > As well as with "plots.implicit", those will help the user to discover > what is available in Sage.
Ahahahah.. Less talk, more tickets in needs_review :-P > Some are less consistent and should be fixed: > > - BlockDesign()/IncidenceStructure() designs. (note that "Design" is > unused). "should be fixed" ? Hey, I like it as it is right now. Plus I need help to review actual new features in this folder. Not only for cosmetics :-P https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-combinat-devel/yYtZI0xdt5o/discussion Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelp ! This stuff is great, and it's rotting at the moment :-P Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
