Hi there, I have to admit that I haven't touched that package in years, but I agree that we should use your database properly (my code is a bit of a hack). I personally won't be able to make it to your workshop but I CCed [sage-devel], perhaps some other developer would be up for it.
On Thursday 11 Jul 2013, you wrote: > Dear Mr. Albrecht, > > I learned that you are the author of the SymbolicData package for Sage. > I am currently working at the SymbolicData project. After the project > lay idle for some time, we are now working on consolidating our data and > transforming it towards RDF/Linked Data. That means (as a first > approxmiation) that we separated resource data and metadata. > Additionally, we have collected bibliographical data. To query our > database one can use the query language SPARQL. > > Currently we are looking into using Sage as a back-end to provide > services to the community and to specify meanings of our predicates used > in RDF. > > Right now I'm not sure which data the SymbolicData Sage package is > using. There might also be some differences, for example Czapor-86b > should only have variables x and y, while a through h and k are parameters. > > It would be interesting to have the package get the data directly from > our database (possibly caching it) and use our RDF description to build > new resources. > > There will be a workshop in Leipzig august 26/27 which would be a great > opportunity to exchange experiences. > > Please let me now if you're still working on the Sage package and if > you're interesting in collaboration. > > Best regards > Andreas Nareike Cheers, Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6532AFB4 _otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF _www: http://martinralbrecht.wordpress.com/ _jab: martinralbre...@jabber.ccc.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
