On 2013-07-08, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ------=_Part_5933_16822679.1373249129839
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Fr=E9d=E9ric Chapoton has written a patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/14733=
>=20
> that will beautify the Sage startup banner using some UTF-8 characters to=
>=20
> draw the box. This will display incorrectly in terminals that do not=20
> support UTF-8. In that case, Sage still works but the box around the banner=
>=20
> is garbled (most likely rendered by placeholder signs for non-ASCII=20
> characters).
>
> Of course, various Sage source files are already UTF-8 encoded, usually=20
> because of non-ASCII characters in docstrings. These will never render=20
> correctly in ancient terminals, nor will editing such source files lead to=
>=20
> much happiness. The questions is essentially, do we want to make it clear=
>=20
> to the user right at the beginning that his terminal is not up to the task=
>=20
> or would we rather only have more subtle errors later?

ssh from strange terminals often garbles any kind of ascii art, leave
alone being UTF-8 clean etc.
I've been doing "export TERM=vt100" much too much to trust
these things.
-1 to the UTF-8 banner, sorry...

Dima

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to