> There is of course a limit of how nested the action is. If you really need > orbits of tuples of sets of tuples of sets of tuples then you'll have to > relabel the permutation group so that its domain doesn't have tuples or > sets.
? But Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy should we relabe anythin ??? Whenever there is a doubt as to how INPUT should be read you can feed the method with a corresponding value of 'action', and the uncertainty disappears !!! Besides we only compute orbits by forwarding stuff to GAP. We it does not know how to do we cannot do either. Volker, your trick is nice because it means that it is mostly useless to define the value of "action" explicitly, but if there is a doubt just define action manually and there is *NO* uncertainty possible. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
