On Sunday, March 10, 2013 1:35:28 PM UTC-5, mmarco wrote: > I am not sure pyGTK (or pyQT, or any other python bindings) is the way > to go. As you said, it would require to install pyGTK, but also GTK > itself and python. I think that is overkill.
I haven't used PyGTK, but I do have experience building self-contained Windows apps based on Python/Tk. A basic Windows-style installer, including Python, Tk, etc, weights in at about 4Mb, which is negligible compared to Sage itself. Using GTK might add a little to that, but probably not much, and you'd gain a lot in terms of ease of maintenance by doing things in Python instead of writing a native Windows app. Actually, for a very basic GUI, Tk would be a reasonable choice instead of GTK or QT; it's long in the tooth, but it's hard to beat in terms of minimal effort to get an acceptable result. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
