On 2012-12-20, Julien Puydt <julien.pu...@laposte.net> wrote: > Le 20/12/2012 18:46, David Kirkby a écrit : >> On 20 December 2012 15:52, Volker Braun<vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If the code in Sage conformed to the C and C++ standards, it would >> build with a standard C compiler. But C/C++ compilers from Sun/Oracle, >> IBM or HP will not compile large portions of Sage, as a lot of the >> code does not conform to the C or C++ standards. Instead it will only >> build with the GNU compiler, which reports thousands of warnings. > > Did someone try to compile sage with llvm yet? sure, the new Apple compilers (for OSX 10.7 and 10.8) are llvm-based. Not sure it's Apple's fault, or llvm's fault, or both, but they suck on Sage code. This fact was the major reason for getting a gcc spkg in Sage.
Dima > > Snark on #sagemath > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
