Le 20/12/2012 15:42, Volker Braun a écrit :
Just some on-topic humor to lighten the mood (thanks to Harald Schilly
on G+):
[vbraun@volker-desktop ~]$ js
js> print({}) // empty object
[object Object]
js> {} + {}
NaN
True since its definitely not a number!
Eh, if you want to lighten the mood, when that thread started, I hadn't
time to answer the following :
"The opensolaris port isn't dead yet but D.Kirkby is working on it"
which is good, since that was supposed to mean:
"The opensolaris port isn't dead yet since D.Kirkby is working on it"
I ditched that mail draft for two reasons when I came back to it: the
point had been made already and I realized my mistake :-P
If a platform has someone working on it and manages to make sage both
compile and work reasonably well (hem... the sage port still has a few
quirks), then there's little reason to ditch it.
Snark on #sagemath
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
