There are a critical mass of people interested (~10?) and who worked on at least some aspect during the ICERM semester. However, there is very little Sage developing experience (Sage usage: yes). I would expect to have no trouble finding people willing to review changes. For this first type of patch where I am changing some basic scheme architecture in morphism.py, point.py, homeset.py, and not just implementing some dynamics functionality, it would probably be better if someone with a little more experience did the review.
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 10:57:24 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Sunday, June 10, 2012 3:30:41 PM UTC+1, William wrote: >> >> The key question: do you have enough people to both write *and >> referee* the code? >> > > AKA: You need at least two people to put something into Sage :-) > > > On Sunday, June 10, 2012 10:57:24 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Sunday, June 10, 2012 3:30:41 PM UTC+1, William wrote: >> >> The key question: do you have enough people to both write *and >> referee* the code? >> > > AKA: You need at least two people to put something into Sage :-) > > > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
