On 13 March 2012 13:42, Tom Boothby <tomas.boot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:29 AM, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote:
>>> Two years ago, few would believe that a computer could win Jeopardy, >>> much less against the best players in recent history. >> >> I'm not sure what "Jeopardy" is in this context. >> >> I know nobody thought computers would beat humans at chess, but they >> beat the top grandmasters on a regular basis. >> >> But in some ways chess is much easier, as a computer knows the rules, >> and it bascially boils down to processing power. There is no ambiguity >> in the input. But human speak is not so precise. > > Um. Way to fail the Turing test. Here, why don't I google that for you? > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=jeopardy Em, I suggest you consider there are many meanings of that word http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeopardy_%28disambiguation%29 dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
