On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:29 AM, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote:
> On 12 March 2012 01:57, Tom Boothby <tomas.boot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>
>>> I take exception to what he said:
>>>
>>> "It'll probably be related to my goal in the next year or two of making
>>> Mathematica definitively the world's easiest to learn language..."
>>
>> The man's got a respectable goal.  What's to take exception to?
>
> I believe it is a totally unrealistic goal.
>
>> The
>> goal may be unobtainable within our current view of what Mathematica
>> is, but if you read the rest of the reddit discussion, he really seems
>> to be pushing hard on the "alpha" paradigm, and natural language
>> interaction.
>
> He has Wolfram|Alpha, and that takes natural language, but it has some
> serious problems. I'm sure he can improve it, but personally I'm
> convinced Mathematica will be the easyist language to learn. If you
> mean will it be the easist to get a result, then perhaps it might be.
>
> As I noted before, there's a big difference between learning a
> language properly, and being able to cobble something
> together that does what you want it to do.
>
>> Two years ago, few would believe that a computer could win Jeopardy,
>> much less against the best players in recent history.
>
> I'm not sure whta "Jeopardy" is in this context.
>
> I know nobody thought computers would beat humans at chess, but they
> beat the top grandmasters on a regular basis.
>
> But in some ways chess is much easier, as a computer knows the rules,
> and it bascially boils down to processing power. There is no ambiguity
> in the input. But human speak is not so precise.

Um.  Way to fail the Turing test.  Here, why don't I google that for you?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=jeopardy

>
> Anyway, we shall see in a couple of years time if Wolfram was right,
> but past experience tells me he exagerates. His book "NKS" was such an
> example. He is undoubty a bright guy, but has an ego the size of the
> moon.
>
>
> dave
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
> sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to