On Mar 3, 2012 11:47 PM, "Jeroen Demeyer" <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > > On 2012-03-04 00:21, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: > > Also, I would like to decouple the sage-scripts spkg from sage > > releases, since in many cases it seems like the only change is a > > version bump. I've added SAGE_VERSION and SAGE_RELEASE_DATE to > > sage-env, which can hopefully remedy this. > Please don't. I am in favour of what you suggest, but maybe not > everybody is. I wouldn't do it as part of the "rewrite command line > handling" patch, because it has a lot of consequences.
Can you be more specific? Introducing the two variables or decoupling sage-scripts? If you mean the latter, as long as the scripts generated have the sage release info in them (which is not what I was planning, but certainly can be done), then I fail to see the consequences. > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
