On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Michael Orlitzky <mich...@orlitzky.com> wrote: > On 03/01/2012 04:00 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: >> >> >> I'm sorry, but I still fail to see how situation : >> >> sage contains all its deps (even if they're already there) >> >> will be any better for subtle bugs than situation : >> >> sage has the same deps, but doesn't manage them itself more than by >> declaring them (and having the system packaging satisfy them). >> > > This will probably just be a losing battle, until we can demonstrate that > we've won. The way forward is the sage-on-gentoo/prefix approach: > spkg-install scripts are just a poor excuse for ebuilds already. > Once sage-on-gentoo gets back upstream and into Gentoo proper, we'll be able > [...]
Nobody is stopping you from producing a sage-on-gentooo distribution. Go for it. William -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
