On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:36:52AM -0800, Nils Bruin wrote: > I don't think there is a requirement to have the documentation of an > optional package installed in the general documentation?
I guess not though this is ugly. > It looks like the warning mentioned in > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10333#comment:25 > > should go away if you delete > > " sage/libs/lrcalc/lrcalc" > > (doc/en/reference/libs.rst, line 28) > > Once your package goes standard, you can put that line in. The > administrative burden of this pales in comparison to all the > "#optional - lrcalc" comments that you got to put in and remove upon > standard inclusion. Oh well; that would have saved the time to do a ticket on top of a ticket, etc. But arguing over it would take even more time :-) I stripped the patch from this hunk and reposted it. Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net> http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
