On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 01:04:46PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Ok, let's not waste more time discussing this. Unless someone
> complains loud immediately, I consider that there is a consensus on
> making lrcalc a standard spkg, after a one-release period as an
> optional spkg in order to satisfy the official rule. I created #11563
> accordingly.
#10333 (interface to lrcalc as optional spkg) got almost merged, but
finally there is a little documentation issue: I am not sure we
currently have support for conditionally defined documentation for
conditionally compiled Python modules (see #10333 for details).
Unless:
- Someone knows how to achieve this simply
- Someone complains loud in the upcoming two days
I propose to go for the simple and time saving solution: to make
lrcalc right away a standard package, skipping the one release
probation period.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
