On Thursday, 1 December 2011 10:57:21 UTC+8, kcrisman wrote: > > On Nov 30, 9:38 pm, Dima Pasechnik <dim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, 1 December 2011 05:40:35 UTC+8, Juanjo wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:32 PM, kcrisman <kcr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> That is weird that you have to do this. Juanjo suggested that he had > > >> made a bunch of changes to totally change how forking works in ECL > > >> this summer, but maybe they weren't merged? I'm cc:ing him on this. > > > > > I did not change the way fork is used: fork is broken in cyginw, > period. > > > However, I managed to avoid using fork() altogether, at least when > > > compiling programs. This does not solve the problem; it just hides it. > > > > I don't see how you managed to completely avoid it (I hope we talk about > > the same ECL version, do we?! We usehttp:// > sage.math.washington.edu/home/kcrisman/ecl-11.1.1.p3.spkg). > > No, I don't think so! See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11884 > and the spkg there, which contains CVS/git/whatever from mid- > November. This is merged in 4.8.alpha3. > You didn't mention that thing here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6743 or here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/CygwinPort How could anyone have known... Oh well.
Dima - kcrisman > > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
