On Nov 30, 9:38 pm, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 1 December 2011 05:40:35 UTC+8, Juanjo wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:32 PM, kcrisman <kcri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> That is weird that you have to do this. Juanjo suggested that he had > >> made a bunch of changes to totally change how forking works in ECL > >> this summer, but maybe they weren't merged? I'm cc:ing him on this. > > > I did not change the way fork is used: fork is broken in cyginw, period. > > However, I managed to avoid using fork() altogether, at least when > > compiling programs. This does not solve the problem; it just hides it. > > I don't see how you managed to completely avoid it (I hope we talk about > the same ECL version, do we?! We > usehttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kcrisman/ecl-11.1.1.p3.spkg).
No, I don't think so! See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11884 and the spkg there, which contains CVS/git/whatever from mid- November. This is merged in 4.8.alpha3. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
