On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Michael Orlitzky <mich...@orlitzky.com> wrote: > (I use Sage on Gentoo) > > For maintainers, the argument is that a package manager should handle > dependencies for you. It's easier to write the dependencies down in a > text file than it is to maintain and ship them all with every release. > > For many users and some developers, it's easier to have everything > packaged together. > > I don't think these two are mutually exclusive. If sage-on-gentoo > succeeds [...]
I was under the impression that "sage-on-gentoo" has already succeeded. What am I missing? What are the goals for sage-on-gentoo, if it hasn't succeeded? -- William -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
