No idea why Google posted this by itself... 8/ On 1 Sep., 09:28, leif <not.rea...@online.de> wrote: > On 1 Sep., 09:07, Dan Drake <dr...@kaist.edu> wrote: > > > I installed the current alpha version of Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10) into a > > virtual machine to see if Sage builds on it. Unfortunately, it doesn't. > > > My virtual machine is a 32-bit machine with 1 gigabyte of RAM, and uses > > gcc 4.6.1. Most of Sage 4.7.2.alpha2 built with no problem, but Singular > > and Symmetrica both failed. The Symmetrica failure is a linker problem > > (I think); the Singular one is a mystery to me. > > > Attached are logs for "./sage -f spkg/standard/...". Any ideas what's > > going on? > > Stricter linker semantics, already known. (See also #11674, where > someone else tried the same.) > > For symmetrica, '-lm' has to be moved, but there's actually already a > new spkg which removes the test executable completely, and thereby > also the (need for the) '-lm'; see .
See #10719 (IMHO needs work). > The problem with Singular is the order of '-ldl' and '-lkernel'; the > latter uses the former, so the order has to be flipped. Haven't yet > checked whether this is already fixed in a *current* upstream release > (we're still at 3-1-1-4, upstream is 3-1-3 IIRC). Hopefully Sage's > version will be upgraded during Sage/Singular Days (SD34) at the end > of this month. > > An ugly work-around is to set LDFLAGS ... to "-ldl". (A bit strange that this works.) Sorry for the duplicate post, no idea what happened there. -leif -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
