On Aug 16, 2011, at 10:51 PM, kcrisman wrote: >>> If the owner forgot about the ticket (holidays and stuff), I think it >>> is perfectly fine if the author him- or herself asks on one of the >>> sage lists (probably sage-devel is a good choice, or a specialised >>> list if that exists for the given topic). > > I think that "owner" is little more than a random name of someone who > has asked to receive notifications about this type of ticket.
Oops. I usually make myself owner of tickets that I am working on, mostly because that's how we did it where I used to work. > I don't think you should blame yourself. I think there is a lot more > ownership of Sage by people other than William Stein now, which is > very positive. However, that said, having his energy is very > helpful :) > > There's also the issue of people not having as much time to review as > before? We definitely need more reviewers in the mix. Another trick is to review someone else's ticket and then ask them to review yours. e.g. kcrisman has reviewed so many of my tickets that I would be obliged to review anything he asked me to (assuming I were competent to do so of course). Unfortunately, I can't help with probability distributions, or I would ask you to review some of mine :-) -Ivan P.S. kcrisman, I've been planning to work on 8473, but can't seem to find the time. Thanks for your patience. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
