On Jul 27, 1:56 pm, Burcin Erocal <bur...@erocal.org> wrote: > sage: from sage.misc.citation import get_systems > sage: get_systems("integrate(cos(x^2), x)") > ['MPFI', 'ginac', 'GMP', 'Maxima'] >
And it's fun! I have just one publication using Sage, and running get_systems on my main function returns: ['MPFI', 'Singular', 'MPFR', 'ginac', 'GMP', 'Maxima'] I'd *love* to put this data in some web form. Seeing such a long list (which is not alphabetized) does make me wonder "how much" each one was used though . . . This might be measured by number of function calls, or total time for function calls. Both ways of measuring (or any combination thereof) certainly have shortcomings, and I think there are some fair reasons not to include any such measurement at all in a citation list. But seeing the list does make me *so* curious! -Niles p.s. As far as I can see, the ordering of the systems has no particular meaning -- they're keys in a dictionary. p.p.s. This "systems" dictionary could easily fall out of date . . . -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org