On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Burcin Erocal <bur...@erocal.org> wrote: > Great idea! Such statistics would also help convince package authors > that Sage provides exposure for their project as well as a separate > (mathematical) test suite, regular build tests on many platforms and > in many cases bug fixes. > > Like Andrey, I heard the FUD that "inclusion of X into Sage will mean > that people will stop giving credit to X." Maybe we should be more > proactive about this issue.
Big +1 > How about changing the credits() function to include a list of > components of Sage with links to their web pages and an example with > the get_systems() function? +1 > > > Cheers, > Burcin > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
