On Friday 04 March 2011, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 3 March 2011 19:26, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 20:16, Dr. David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net>
wrote:
> >> IIRC we have not been successful in recent times. Do we get any feedback
> >> why?
> >
> > No, one vague guess is that there is a limit for each topic and we are
> > - obviously - in a small "math software" topic. Let's see, trying
> > again doesn't hurt.
> >
> > H
>
> Perhaps a very different approach is needed. One thing I feel Sage
> lacks is engineering applications. How about basing the applications
> upon building engineering applications on the top of maths software,
> rather than adding more maths?
Hi David, if you take a look at last years application you'll see that it
wasn't that particularly heavy on the mathematics.
http://wiki.sagemath.org/gsoc10
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www: http://martinralbrecht.wordpress.com/
_jab: martinralbre...@jabber.ccc.de
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
