On Dec 10, 9:03 am, John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Rob Beezer <goo...@beezer.cotse.net> wrote: > > Thanks, everybody, for the illuminating discussion. > > > Is there any objection to deprecating the current .adjoint() function > > (which returns a matrix of cofactors) and renaming it as the > > "adjugate"? With all the usual procedures and warnings for the > > deprecation. That would begin the process to free up "adjoint" for > > something else (ideally the conjugate-transpose). > > +1
+1 from me as well. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
