On 12/9/10 6:03 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
Thanks, everybody, for the illuminating discussion.
Is there any objection to deprecating the current .adjoint() function
(which returns a matrix of cofactors) and renaming it as the
"adjugate"? With all the usual procedures and warnings for the
deprecation. That would begin the process to free up "adjoint" for
something else (ideally the conjugate-transpose).
+1
Jason - wasn't there some spirited discussion a while ago about using
Python properties? I couldn't find it in a search.
Well, I don't know how "spirited" it was, but I'm still in favor of
using properties occasionally. I believe you can get Sphinx to
recognize documentation for properties, which would take care of one of
the objections.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
