> 4. The scipy dev team is currently having a thread about setting up a > snippet web database for scipy. It's just in the planning stages now; maybe > we could work together with them on a system we both could use.
That was a long thread! Let me sum it up: Many people liked gist, but many others said a ranking/comment system was more important to let the outdated/broken/unmaintained code fade away. So they were talking something like a merge of stackoverflow and gist, then there was a lot of discussion about licensing, and the conversation kind of faded away. No clear conclussion. Such solutions seems a bit like overkill when the wiki is working fine: it only contains nice examples, neatly classified into math areas. So, to me, using something like gist is not motivated as a way to improve quality of interacts in the wiki. Maybe as a way to keep them current. Maybe to encourage more Sage users to participate. Different motivations would suggest different tools. Don't know what's the main goal. Will keep adding interacts to the wiki while they mature to get into sage. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
