On 11/9/10 2:24 PM, William Stein wrote:
Your two options are sort of orthogonal. Personally I think we should have:
(a) a library of high quality stable tested working interacts that
are included in the Sage library,
(b) many interacts that are of varying quality that users post somewhere.
Regarding (b), we currently have that on a wiki. Instead it could be
at some other site where the interacts
are rated and ranked by users. When they don't work, they get low
rankings and there could be a "report this broken interact" button.
If an interact gets uniformly high rankings, they could get migrated
into the library (a), and the code on the site replaced by a 1-line
call into the library.
I agree. That sounds like a good solution. Time will tell how quickly
interacts get polished and move from (b) to (a).
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
